Effects of different video modalities in flipped english writing classes on students’ writing scores
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigated different modalities of videos in a flipped classroom for English writing classes at a state university preparatory school. The study, a quasi-experimental design in nature, was conducted with six experimental groups and one control group (n=127). The participants’ writing performance formed the study data which was collected with a writing pretest and two posttests, conceptual and essay writing posttests. The data analysis showed that the group studying “Animation with simultaneous Text and sequenced Narration in a user-paced environment” outperformed the control group having lectures in class in the conceptual posttest. The groups studying “Animation with simultaneous Narration and sequenced Text, in a whole presentation, where students studied all the parts of a video in a system-paced design, and then they answered the related questions,” and “Animation with simultaneous Narration and sequenced Text in a part-by-part presentation, in which students studied each part of a video, and then they answered the related questions” outperformed the control group in the essay writing posttest. The paper provided a discussion and a set of recommendations on studying flipped classroom.
Keywords: Flipped classroom; inverted classroom; writing; language learning.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).