Validity of double dividend hypothesis in EU-15 countries

Main Article Content

Mahmut Unsal Sasmaz

Abstract

The increases in climate change, biological diversity loss, ecosystem degradation, effects of chemical pollution on the human health, scarcity of the sources, energy and water security have been experienced in the world in recent years together with globalization and the sharp increases in the mass production. In this regard, especially developed countries have begun to implement the policies such as environmental tax reforms to overcome these problems. This study examines the impact of environmental tax reforms on both environment and employment in EU-15 countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom) during the period 1995-2012 by using panel cointegration and Panel FMOLS tests. We found that the double dividend hypothesis was valid in EU-15 countries.

Keywords: double dividend hypothesis, environmental tax reform, panel data analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sasmaz, M. U. (2017). Validity of double dividend hypothesis in EU-15 countries. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjhss.v2i2.412
Section
Articles

References

Allan, G., Patrizio, Lecca, Peter., Mcgregor, & Kim, Swales. (2014). The Economic and Environmental Impact of A Carbon Tax For Scotland: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis, Ecological Economics, 100, pp.40-50.

Bento, A.M., & Jacobsen, M. (2007). Ricardian Rents, Environmental Policy and The Double dividend Hypothesis, Journal Environmental Economic Management, 53, 17–31.

Bovenberg, A. Lans, & Frederıck Van Der Ploeg. (1998), Consequences of Environmental Tax Reform for Unemloyment and Welfare, Environmental and Resource Economics, 12, 137-150.

Bovenberg, A.L., & Mooij, R.A. (1994). Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation, The American Economic Review, 84, 1085–1089.

Conefrey, Thomas, John D. Fitz, Gerald, Laura Malaguzzi, Valeri and Richard S.J., TOL. (2008). The Impcact of A Carbon Tax on Economic Growth and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Ireland, ESRI Working Paper, 251, 1-43.

EUROSTAT(2015),Environmental Tax Revenues,
Retrieved November 07, 2015 from: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do,

EUROSTAT (2015), Greenhouse Gas Emissions, November 01, 2015 from:
http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do,

EUROSTAT (2015), Unemployment, September 15, 2015 from:
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tipsun20&plugin=1 ,

EUROSTAT (2015), Real GDP, November 13, 2015 from:
http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do,

EUROSTAT (2015), Energy Consumption, November 13, 2015 from:
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=t2020_34&plugin=1 ,

Florczak, Waldemar. (2006). Macroekonomic Consequences Inroducing Taxes on Carbon Dioxide Emission In Poland, Paper Elaborated for TranSust.Scan Project, February 24, 2015 from: http://www.transust.org/workplan/papers/wp2_task_3_poland3.pdf

Fraser, I., & Waschik, R. (2013). The Double Dividend Hypothesis in a CGE model: Specific Factors and the Carbon Base, Energy Economics, 39, 283–295.

Goulder, L.H., & Schneider, S.H. (1999). Induced Technological Change And The Attractiveness of CO2 Abatement Policies, Resource Energy Economic, 21, 211–253.

Günaydin, I. (1999). Çevre Vergilerinin İstihdam Üzerine Etkisi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 4, 277-292.

Hur, Ga-hyeong. (2000). Double Dividend Hypothesis of Environmental Tax in Republic of Korea: For Sustainable Development, 2nd International Critical Geography Conference Taegu University, Taegu, Korea.

Lutz, C. & Bernd, M. (2010). Environmental Tax Reform in the Europan Union: Impact on CO2 Emissions and Economy, Zeitschrift fur Energiewirtschaft, 34, 1-10.

Manresa, A., & Sancho, F. (2005). Implementing a Double Dividend: Recycling Ecotaxes Towards Lower Labour Taxes. Energy Policy, 33, 1577–1585.

Markandya, A., González-Eguino, M., & Escapa, M. (2012). Environmental Fiscal Reform and Unemployment in Spain, BC3 Working Paper Series, 2012-04.

Nerudová, D., & Dobranschia, M. (2014). Double Dividend Hypothesis: Can it Occur When Tackling Carbon Emissions?, Enterprise and the Competitive Environment Conference, Brno, Czech Republic.

Orlov, A., Grethe, H., & McDonald, S. (2013). Carbon Taxation in Russia: Prospects for a Double Dividend and Improved Energy Efficiency, 37, 128–140.

Parry, I.W.H., & Bento, A.M. (1998). Tax Deductions, Environmental Policy, and The “Double Dividend” Hypothesis, Journal Environmental Economic Management, 39, 67–96.

Taheripour, F., Khanna, M., & Nelson, C.H. (2008). Welfare Impacts of Alternative Public Policies for Agricultural Pollution Control in an Open Economy: A General Equilibrium Framework, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(3), 701–718.

Takeda, S. (2007). The Double Dividend From Carbon Regulations In Japan, Journal of Japanese and International Economies, 21, 336–364.

Vandyck, Toon & Denise Van, Regemorter. (2014). Distributional and Regional Economic Impact of Energy Taxes in Belgium, Energy Policy, 72, 190-203.

Williams, R.C. (2002). Environmental Tax Interactions When Pollution Affects Health or Productivity, Journal Environmental Economic Management, 44, 261-270.