Main Article Content
Aim of this study is to investigate how physiotherapists evaluate the anatomy education they receive on clinical courses and practices in their professional lives.The mean age of the 50 (27F, 23M) physiotherapists was 33, 78±8, 89 and they work in public (n=26) and private sectors (n=24). Face-to-face interviews with physiotherapists were questioned about the duration of the anatomy education and methods. Anatomy educations’ effect on vocational courses, assessment-treatment programs and different physiotherapy disciplines has been investigated.Anatomy education in theoretical courses overhead and PowerPoint were used more often and 44% of them reported that they never saw cadaver. Besides for their educational competence reports 30% were theoretically and 46% were practically inadequate. The effect of the anatomy education on the clinical course was largely considered to be very important. When the effect of anatomy on different physiotherapy disciplines was evaluated, the most important effect on orthopedic rehabilitation (92%) 94% of physiotherapists think anatomic education must continue after graduation.It is concluded that anatomy education is insufficient especially practically, therefore its quality must be increased at graduate level and continuity must be ensured throughout the whole career.
Keywords: Anatomy education, physiotherapy, vocational courses.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).