Technological opportunities and innovation performance: evidence from Polish manufacturing firms

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Mar 22, 2017
DOI https://doi.org/10.18844/gjhss.v3i4.1609

Main Article Content

Tomasz Kijek Elżbieta Skrzypek

Abstract

Technological opportunity is a concept that is attracting attention from scholars and practitioners in the fields of economics and the management of innovation. In general, technological opportunities refer to the contribution of external knowledge to the innovation activities of firms in a given industry. Although the role of external knowledge has been discussed in detail in the open innovation literature, there is still a challenge: how to operationalize technological opportunities and measure their impact on firms’ innovation performance. In order to reduce this gap in the literature, our study aims at analysing the effects of technological opportunities on the output of the innovation process. Our empirical research is based on micro-data from the Polish Community Innovation Survey. The sample consists of 1979 manufacturing firms. We use the linear regression to estimate the relationship in which the share of innovative product sale is a function of a set of technological opportunity variables. These variables refer to two distinct measures of technological opportunities, i.e. the contribution of external knowledge to innovation activity and the propensity to collaboration on innovation. Our results show that inter-firm differences in technological opportunities explain inter-firm variation in innovation outcome. Moreover, we do not find any moderating impact from the absorptive capacity on the relationship between technological opportunities and innovation performance.

Keywords: technological opportunities, external knowledge, innovation, absorptive capacity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol 3 No 4 (2017): Selected Papers of 5th World Conference on Business, Economics and Management (BEM-2016)
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

Becker, W. & Peters, J. (2000). Technological opportunities, absorptive capacities and innovation. Paper presented at The Eighth International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society Conference, Manchester. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.196.3245&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Budzynska, K. (2014). Impact outsourcing of competitiveness of enterprise (in Polish). Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu, 16 (5), 29-34.
Budzynska, K. (2014). Creating value added of a business through an off -shoring activities (in Polish). Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecinskiego, 804, 555-564.
Carbonell, P., Rodriguez-Escudero, A. I. & Pujari, D. (2009). Customer involvement in new service development: An examination of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 536–550.
Cohen, W. M. (2010). Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation, 129-213. Amsterdam-Oxford: North-Holland.
Cohen W. & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128-152.
Cui, A. S. & Fang, W. (2015). Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1-23.
Floricel, S. & Miller, R. (2003). An exploratory comparison of the management of innovation in the New and Old economies. R&D Management, 33 (5), 501–525.
Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J. & Mohnen, P. (2010). Measuring the returns to r&d. In In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation. 1034-1076. Amsterdam-Oxford: North-Holland.
Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis. New York: Springer.
Jovanovic, B. & Rousseau, P. L. (2005). general purpose technologies. In A. Philippe & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth, 1181-1224. Amsterdam-Oxford: North-Holland.
Kasztelan, A. (2013). A comparative analysis of the environmental competitiveness of Lubelskie and Zachodniopomorskie Voivodships. Annual Set The Environment Protection, 15 (1), 637-648.
Kasztelan, A. (2010). Environmental competitiveness of regions – Attempt of conceptualization. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 5 (2), 77-86.
Kijek, T. & Kasztelan, A. (2013). Eco-innovation as a factor of sustainable development. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 8 (2), 103-111
Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S.G. (1995). On the sources and significance of inter-industry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24, 185–205.
Kijek, T. (2013). External conditions influencing the implementation of eco-innovations in european enterprises. Annual Set The Environment Protection, 15 (1), 659-670.
Kijek, T. (2013). Innovation capital as a driver of eco-innovations: A case of european enterprises. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (ECIE 2013), 1. Book Series: Proceedings of the European Conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 363-369. Brussels: Hogeschool Univ Brussel,.
Levin, R. C., Cohen, W. M. & Mowery, D.C. (1985). R & D appropriability, opportunity and market structure: New evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses. American Economic Review Proceedings, 75, 20–24.
Nelson, R. R. & Wolff, E. N. (1997). Factors behind cross-industry differences in technical progress. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8, 205–220.
Nordhaus, W. (1969). Invention, growth and welfare: A theoretical treatment of technological change. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press. Oltra, M. J. & Flor, M. (2003).The impact of technological opportunities and innovative capabilities on firms' output innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 12, 137-144.
Pakes, A. & Schankerman, M. (1984). An exploration into the determinants of research intensity. In: Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&D Patents and Productivity. University of Chicago Press for the NBER, Chicago, 209-232.
Rosenberg, N. (1974). Science, invention, and economic growth. Economic Journal, 84, 90–108.
Rosenberg, N. & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23 (3), 323-348.
Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firms size, market structure, opportunity and the output of patented inventions. American Economic Review, 55, 1097-1125.
Smets, L. P. M., Langerak, F. & Rijsdijk, S. A. (2013). Shouldn’t customers control customized product development?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30 (6), 1242–1253.
Varian, H. (1992). Microeconomics analysis. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.