Bologna process in fashion design education: An evaluation of applications used in Turkey
Main Article Content
Abstract
Higher education has been affected by a number of changes in the past decade, including higher rates of participation, internationalisation, the growing importance of knowledge-led economies and increased global competition. These changes have resulted in to two main European policies: the Bologna Process and the Lisbon Strategy, including the Modernisation Agenda for Universities. Both these broader international developments and the two specific European policy processes have been translated into policy change at national level affecting principally external quality assurance, autonomy, funding and research but also the shape and size of many higher education systems. These fundamental changes, along with the implementation of the core Bologna reforms, have altered deeply all activities of HEIs.
As the borders between European nations become less apparent, as monetary systems become uniform, as commerce and industry increasingly become multi-national, and as Europe is regarded as a single entity on the international stage it makes sense to develop a uniform educational system.
When Bologna Process is evaluated in terms of education in fashion design, it can be summarized as follows:
For students; it enables students to spend less time in educational institutions, have fewer courses compared to earlier practices, a more transparent process and a voice in education process. For academicians; it enables an increasing workload, caused by planning and evaluations although number of courses is reduced and a more transparent process. For curriculum; it offers fewer numbers of courses, a credit system that takes all learning cycle into consideration, a flexibility created with more optional courses, but a measurable standard method that is not flexible.
Keywords: Bologna process, fashion design, fashion design education
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Birtwistle, T. (2009).Towards 2010 (and then beyond) - The Context of the Bologna Process. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16, 1, 61-62.
Çakır, H., Karataş, (2012). A look at instructional systems development process. Educational Technology, Theory and Practice 2, 1, 19-35.
Calık, T., & Suzen, Z. (2013). Assessments in Institutional Evaluation Reports Prepared by European University Association and Academic Staff’s Agreement Degrees toIm provement Recommendations.
Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 19(3), 355-390.
Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking Design Education for the 21st Century: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Discussion. Design Issues, 17, 1.
Froment, E. (2006). The evolving vision and focus of the Bologna Process. Bologna Handbook: Making Bologna Work, Berlin: RAABE Nachschlagen-Finden.
Güneş, F. (2012). Skills and Competencies Set Forth by Bologna Process in Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education and Science,2,1, 1-9.
Heinze, T., Knill, C. (2008). Analysing the differential impact of the Bologna Process: Theoretical considerations on national conditions for international policy convergence. HighEduc, DOI 10.1007/s10734-007-9107-z, 56, 493–510
Kalaycı, N. (2008). TQM center" and "currıculum” that have been neglected during the application process of TQM in higher education”. Türk Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6, 2, 163-188
Nohutcu, A. (2006). Bilgi toplumunda yükseköğretim kurumlarının yeniden yapılandırılması ve yonetimi: Baslıca eğilimler, gelismeler ve Bologna sureci. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, Journal of Knowledge Economy and Management, 1, 2, 50-66.
Ölmez, Kıyıcı, G. (2012). The Bologna Process: An opportunity or a threat for higher education system?, Suleyman Demirel University, Institute of Social Sciences, Public Administration Department, Master of Sciences Thesis, Isparta.
Süngü, H., Bayrakçı, M. (2010). Acreditation studies in higher education after Bologna process. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8, 4, 895-912.
Turkish Council of Higher Education, (2010). Yuksekoğretimde yeniden yapılanma: 66 soruda Bologna sureci uygulamaları. Ankara.
Yılmaz, D. V. (2013). Changing context of higher education: Transformations and trends in the 21st Century.Journal of Higher Education, doi:10.2399/yod.13.018, 3, 3, 169-176.