Analysis of senior school certificate examination chemistry questions for higher-order cognitive skills
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Assessment as classroom activities is a fundamental process required to determine the extent to which intended learning outcomes has been achieved. Whatever form of assessment is employed to measure students’ learning, they should include tasks that are authentic, relevant and approximate skills students will need in real-life situations. These skills are well accentuated in the advocacy of the current reforms in science education to develop students’ higher-order cognitive skills (HOCS) through question-asking, critical thinking and problem solving. Therefore, this research analyzes chemistry questions of senior school certificate examination conducted by the National Examination Council (NECO) within the framework of Bloom’s revised taxonomy of cognitive objectives. The source of data consisted of 257 questions drawn from 5 years examination, from 2010 – 2014. The results from this research indicated that about 80% and 44% of the questions require lower-order cognitive skills (LOCS) and factual knowledge respectively. The results further revealed that there was no question in the evaluate category of the HOCS, and none of the questions required students to apply metacognitive knowledge. The research concludes that the chemistry questions were not as cognitively demanding as they should be, and it is recommended that, examination should ensure that examination questions reflect the dual perspective of the Bloom’s revised taxonomy of cognitive process skills and the knowledge dimensions.
Keywords: higher-order cognitive skills, Bloom’s revised taxonomy, cognitive process skills, knowledge dimension, chemistry questions.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).
References
Azar, A. (2005). Analysis of Turkish high-school physics-examination questions and university entrance exams questions according to Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 2(2), 144 – 150. Retrieved from http://www.tused.org/internet/tused/archive/V2/i2/fulltext/tusedv2i2s5.pdf
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives - Handbook 1 Cognitive domain. London: Longmans.
Edwards, N. (2010). An analysis of the alignment of the grade 12 physical sciences examination and the core curriculum in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 30(4), 571 – 590.
Karamustafaoglu, S., Sevim, S., Karamustafaoglu, O., & Cepni, S. (2003). Analysis of Turkish high school chemistry examination questions according to Bloom’s taxonomy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4(1), 25 – 30. Retrieved from: http://www.uoi.gr/cerp/2003_February/pdf/05Karamustafaoglu.pdf
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212 – 218.
Federal Republic of Nigeria (2013). National policy on education. Yaba – Lagos: NERDC Press.
Olorundare, A. S. (2014). Theory into practice: Beyond surface curriculum in science education. The one hundred and forty-seventh Inaugural Lecture presented at the University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Ojerinde, D. (2011). Public examinations in Nigeria. India: Melrose Books & Publishing Limited.
Tikkanen, G., & Aksela, M. (2012). Analysis of Finnish chemistry matriculation examinations questions according to cognitive complexity. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 8(3), 258 – 268. Retrieved from: https://www.journals.uio.no/index.php/nordina/article/viewFile/532/578
Tsaparlis, G., & Zoller, U (2003). Evaluation of higher vs. lower-order cognitive skills-type examinations in chemistry: Implications for university in-class assessment and examinations. University Chemistry Education, 7(2), 50 – 57.
West African Examination Council (2005). Regulations and syllabuses for the West African school certificate examination (WASSCE). WAEC, Accra, Ghana.
Zheng, A. Y., Lawhorn, J. K., Lumley, T., & Freeman, S. (2008). Application of Bloom’s taxonomy debunks the MCAT myth. Science, 319, 414 – 415.