Determination of student opinions in augmented reality
Article Sidebar
Published
Oct 14, 2016
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rapid development of the new technology has changed classroom teaching methods and tools in a positive way. This study investigated the classroom learning with augmented reality and the impact of student opinions. 97 volunteer undergraduate students took part in this study. Results included data in the form of frequencies, percentages and descriptive statistics. The results show that, with gamification methods, augmented reality content affected students’ opinions in a positive way. When QR codes are used in the classroom, students feel independent from classroom materials and can access various resources. Moreover, students think that, when augmented reality in the classroom is used, education is more enjoyable.
Keywords: Augmented reality; gamification; opinions; students
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Al Bataineh, M. (2014). The relationship between social studies teachers attitudes towards technology and their perceptions of competency needed for implementing technology in their classrooms in Jordan. World Journal On Educational Technology, 6(2). Retrieved November 5, 2015, from http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/wjet/article/view/3185
Bachir, O., & Zoubir, A. (2013). Internet-Based Teleoperation of a Puma 600 Virtual Robot with ANFIS Based Controller. Global Journal On Technology, 4(2). Retrieved February 2, 2015, fromhttp://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/P-ITCS/article/view/2586/2003
Cakal M., Eymirli E. (2012). Augmented Reality. Retrieved February 15, 2016, from http://www.kudaka.org.tr/ekler/fa254-artirilmis_gerceklik_teknolojisi.pdf
Cetinkaya, H. & Akcay M. (2013). Augmented Reality Applications in Educational Environments. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://ab.org.tr/ab13/bildiri/114.pdf
Dewitt, D., & Siraj, S. (2011). Learners perceptions of technology for design of a collaborative mLearning module. World Journal On Educational Technology, 2(3). Retrieved September 1, 2015, from http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/wjet/article/view/172
Gocmen, P. (2015). Book of future in the context of postmodern theory with using augmented reality.Global Journal On Humanities And Social Sciences, 1(1). Retrieved December 15, 2015, fromhttp://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/pntsbs/article/view/3603/3234
Idoughi, D. (2014). WordNet a camera projector based ubiquitous user interface framework in a learning environment. Global Journal Of Information Technology, 4(1). Retrieved November 15, 2015, fromhttp://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/gjit/article/view/3173/2564
Keser, H., Uzunboylu, H., & Ozdamli, F. (2011). The trends in technology supported collaborative learning studies in 21st century. World Journal On Educational Technology, 3(2). Retrieved September 12, 2015, from http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/wjet/article/view/256
Ozbay, E., & Cinar, A. (2013). 3D Reconstruction Technique with Kinect and Point Cloud Computing.Global Journal On Technology, 3(0). Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/P-ITCS/article/view/2009/1778
Ozcan, D., & Genc, Z. (2016). Pedagogical Formation Education via Distance Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,12(2), 347-360.
Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2002). Using augmented reality for teaching earthsun relationship to undergraduate geography students.
Uzunboylu, H., & Karagozlu, D. (2015). Flipped classroom: a review of recent literature. World Journal On Educational Technology, 7(2). Retrieved September 18, 2016, from http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/wjet/article/view/3871
Yuen, S., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 4(1), 119-14.
Bachir, O., & Zoubir, A. (2013). Internet-Based Teleoperation of a Puma 600 Virtual Robot with ANFIS Based Controller. Global Journal On Technology, 4(2). Retrieved February 2, 2015, fromhttp://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/P-ITCS/article/view/2586/2003
Cakal M., Eymirli E. (2012). Augmented Reality. Retrieved February 15, 2016, from http://www.kudaka.org.tr/ekler/fa254-artirilmis_gerceklik_teknolojisi.pdf
Cetinkaya, H. & Akcay M. (2013). Augmented Reality Applications in Educational Environments. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://ab.org.tr/ab13/bildiri/114.pdf
Dewitt, D., & Siraj, S. (2011). Learners perceptions of technology for design of a collaborative mLearning module. World Journal On Educational Technology, 2(3). Retrieved September 1, 2015, from http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/wjet/article/view/172
Gocmen, P. (2015). Book of future in the context of postmodern theory with using augmented reality.Global Journal On Humanities And Social Sciences, 1(1). Retrieved December 15, 2015, fromhttp://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/pntsbs/article/view/3603/3234
Idoughi, D. (2014). WordNet a camera projector based ubiquitous user interface framework in a learning environment. Global Journal Of Information Technology, 4(1). Retrieved November 15, 2015, fromhttp://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/gjit/article/view/3173/2564
Keser, H., Uzunboylu, H., & Ozdamli, F. (2011). The trends in technology supported collaborative learning studies in 21st century. World Journal On Educational Technology, 3(2). Retrieved September 12, 2015, from http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/wjet/article/view/256
Ozbay, E., & Cinar, A. (2013). 3D Reconstruction Technique with Kinect and Point Cloud Computing.Global Journal On Technology, 3(0). Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/P-ITCS/article/view/2009/1778
Ozcan, D., & Genc, Z. (2016). Pedagogical Formation Education via Distance Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,12(2), 347-360.
Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2002). Using augmented reality for teaching earthsun relationship to undergraduate geography students.
Uzunboylu, H., & Karagozlu, D. (2015). Flipped classroom: a review of recent literature. World Journal On Educational Technology, 7(2). Retrieved September 18, 2016, from http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/wjet/article/view/3871
Yuen, S., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 4(1), 119-14.