Pre-service teachers’ opinions on cloud supported social network
Main Article Content
Abstract
Pre-service teachers are expected to use new technologies such as Google+ which facilitates contacting, sharing in certain environments and working collaboratively with the help of cloud support in their lessons effectively. This study aims to examine pre-service teachers’ opinions regarding the use of Google+ to support lesson activities. In this study the data was collected using semi-structured interview techniques carried out with pre-service teachers (n=15) chosen by purposeful sampling. The purposes of using Google+ were sharing, chatting and communication, whereas Google Docs was mostly used for its efficiency, interaction, the prudential purpose of use and to support teaching. When the views of the pre-service teachers regarding the use of Google+ were examined it was found that interface being thought to be more complex than other social networks affected the teachers’ first impressions negatively. As the negative first impression towards Google+ changed in time, it was stated to have provided a number of teaching opportunities. Some suggestions regarding the opportunities Google+ offers were also made.
Keywords: Google+, social networks, pre-service teachers’ opinions, cloud computing.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Boyd, D. M., and Ellison, N. B. (2007), Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160-175.
Cohen, J. N. (2012). Review: The Potential of Google+ as a Media Literacy Tool. The Journal of Media Literacy Education, 4(1), 9. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1086&context=jmle
Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6).
Corrocher, N. (2011). The adoption of web 2.0 services: An empirical investigation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(4), 547-558.
Curran, K., Morrison, S., & Mc Cauley, S. (2012). Google+ v Facebook: The comparison. TELKOMNIKA Telecommunication, Computing, Electronics and Control, 10(2), 379-388.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R. ve Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Davis, M. (2008). Semantic Wave 2008 Report: Industry Roadmap to Web 3.0 & Multibillion Dollar Market Opportunities. Executive Summary. Retrieved from: http://www.eurolibnet.eu/files/REPOSITORY/20090507165103_SemanticWaveReport2008.pdf
Educause Learning Initiative (2008). 7 things you should know about Google Apps. Retrieved 10 Novomber 2014 from: https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7035.pdf
Erkollar, A., & Oberer, B. (2011). Trends in Social Media Application: The potential of Google+ for education shown in the example of a bachelor’s degree course on marketing. In Software Engineering, Business Continuity, and Education, 257, 569-578.
Frazel, M. (2009). Using Google and Google tools in the classroom: Grades 5 and up. Teacher Created Resources, Westminster, Calif.
González-Martínez, J. A., Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., Gómez-Sánchez, E., & Cano-Parra, R. (2015). Cloud computing and education: A state-of-the-art survey. Computers & Education, 80, 132-151.
Grossman, R. L. (2009). The case for cloud computing. IT professional, 11(2), 23-27.
Hamlen, K. W., & Thuraisingham, B. (2013). Data security services, solutions and standards for outsourcing. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 35(1), 1–5.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007a). ISTE standarts students. Retrieved 24 November 2014 from: http://www.iste.org
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007b). ISTE standarts teachers. Retrieved 24 November 2014 from: http://www.iste.org
Jou, M., & Wang, J. J. (2013). Observations of achievement and motivation in using cloud computing driven CAD: Comparison of college students with high school and vocational high school backgrounds. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 364–369.
Judd, Charles M.; Smith, Eliot R. & Kidder, Louise H. (1991). Research methods in social relations (6th edition). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
Kaste, M. (2011). Facebook's Newest Challenger: Google Plus. Retrieved 24 November 2014 from: http://jagonews.com/2011/07/google-plus-facebooks-newest-challenger-preview/
Mason, R. (2006). Learning technologies for adult continuing education. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 121-133.
Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444-453.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43.
Murray, K. E., & Waller, R. (2007). Social networking goes abroad. International Educator, 16(3), 56-59.
Osman, F. Y., & Ab Rahim, N. Z. (2011, November). Self-disclosure and Social network sites users' awareness. In Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), 2011 International Conference on IEEE, 1-6.
Parker, K., & Chao, J. (2007). Wiki as a teaching tool. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-learning and Learning Objects, 3(1), 57-72.
Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PEW RESEARCH, (2012). Social Networking Popular Across Globe. Retrieved 20 November 2014 from: http://www.pewglobal.org/2012/12/12/social-networking-popular-across-globe/
Ponnudurai, P., & Jacob, T. T. (2014). Facebook: A shift from social to academia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 122-129.
Revere, L., & Kovach, J. V. (2011). Online technologies for engaged learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(2), 113-124.
Selwyn, N. (2007). ‘Screw Blackboard... do it on Facebook!’: an investigation of students’ educational use of Facebook. Ponencia. En: Poke.
Shaw, C. (2014). Implementing an online social network for health communication (Unpublished Master Thesis). The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Siegle, D. (2010). Cloud Computing: A free technology option to promote collaborative learning. Gifted Child Today, 33(4), 41-45. Retrieved July 12 2014 from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ898571.pdf on
Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2013). I see you: Using the affordances of Google+ to increase social and teaching presence in an online undergraduate teacher education course. ISTE 2013, San Antonio, TX.
Sultan, N. (2010). Cloud computing for education: A new dawn?. International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), 109-116.
Tal-Elhasid, E., & Meishar-Tal, H. (2007). Wikis in academic courses: Models of usage and collaboration. Learning in the technological era, 127-136.
Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174.
TUİK, (2014). Hane halki bilisim teknolojileri kullanim araştirmasi. Retrieved November 15, 2014 from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=16198
Vaquero, L. M., Rodero-Merino, L., Caceres, J., & Lindner, M. (2008). A break in the clouds: towards a cloud definition. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(1), 50-55.
Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428-438.
Watson, J., Besmer, A., & Lipford, H. R. (2012, July). + Your circles: sharing behavior on Google+. In Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (p. 12). ACM.
Wu, T. T. (2014). Using smart mobile devices in social-network-based health education practice: A learning behavior analysis. Nurse Education Today, 34(6), 958-963.
Yee, K., & Hargis, J. (2011). Using Google+ for instruction. (Notes for Editor-1) Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(4), 1302-6488.
Yensen, J. (2012). Mentoring and performance support for graduate students using Google+. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI), 16(3).
Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri. Ankara: Seckin Yayinevi.