Effect of self-directed learning process on multimedia competencies of educational technology students
Main Article Content
Abstract
The current study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Self-directed Learning (SDL) process on multimedia competencies of educational technology students at Arak university in Iran. The sample of the study consisted of all educational technology students studying at Arak university. The sample included students who were selected for project courses in the second semester of academic year 2014-2015. The quasi-experimental research, pre-test, post-test design was used for the study. Before the treatment, the pretest of multimedia competencies was employed, then students in the project course received education through the SDL process. The period lasted for 13 weeks, then the post-test was conducted. For data collection, the researchers prepared a questionnaire of multimedia competencies with three subscales (multimedia instructional design, multimedia production skills, and multimedia production tools). The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by experts in the field of Educational Technology, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was obtained as a reliability of 0.90. The data were analyzed with independent and paired-samples t-test. The results showed that there was a significant difference between students’ scores in pre-test and post-test; and there was no significant difference between male and female students’ scores on multimedia competencies.
Keywords: educational technology, self-directed learning process, multimedia competencies
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Armand, M. (2008). A survey of the curriculum of the educational technology course.Educational Technology Development, 6, 56-62.
Bagheri, M.(2007). Effects of project-based learning strategies on educational technology skills. Paper presented in the first conference of technology for education. Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran.
Brookfield, S. D. (1988). Understanding and facilitating adult learning.School Library Media Quarterly, 16(2), 99-105.
Campbell, K., Kenny, R. F., Schwier, R., A., & Zhang, Z. (2005). A review of what instructional designers do: Questions answered and questions not asked. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(1), 9-26.
Chen, R., & Ma, W. (2009).Teacher and student intrinsic motivation in project-based learning.Instructional Science, 37, 565-578.
Izmirli, O. S., & Kurt, A. A. (2009).Basic competencies of instructional technologists. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 998–1002. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.178.
Fardanesh, H. (2009). A history of educational technology development in Iran. Journal of Education, 25, 16-52.
Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001).Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21(7), 516-525.
Gharaebi, H., Amirteymouri, M., H., & Maghami, H. (2011).An investigation of the relationship between computer self-efficiency and creativity among the educational technology undergraduate students in Allameh Tabatabyi University.Creativity and Entrepreneurship in Human Science, 1(2), 150-178.
Hammond, M., & Collins, R. (1991). Self-Directed Learning: Critical Practice. London: Kogan Page.
Khosravi, M. (2006). The study of curriculum of educational technology in Iran univer¬sities. Unpublished dissertation. Isfahan University, Iran.
Liu, M., Gibby, S., Quiros, O. & Demps, E. (2002). Challenges of being an instructional designerfor new media development: A view from the practitioners. Journal of Edu cational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(3), 195-219.
Maleki, B. (2007). Entrepreneurship in universities. Periodical Journal of Tadbir.18 (3), 25-29.
Mezirow, J. (1985). A critical theory of self-directed learning.New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1985(25), 17-30.
Knowles, M., S. (1975).Self-directed learning. Cambridge. Follett Publishing Co., Chicago.
Salari, V. (2010). Effects of problem-based learning on educational technology undergraduate students’ attitude toward their filed and achievement.Unpublished thesis, Arak University, Iran.
Salehi, E., & Rostami, F. (2008). Barriers and solutions of entrepreneurship of higher education in Iran. Economy, 98, 8-14.
Sugar, W. (2005). Instructional technologist as a coach: Impact of a situated professional development program on teachers' technology use. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 547.
Ritzhaupt, A., Martin, F., & Daniels, K. (2010). Multimedia competencies for an educational technologist: A survey of professionals and job announcement analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(4), 421-449
Taghipur, K., & Dehghanzadeh, K. (2012). A survey of the adaptability of educational technology curriculum with prioritization of educational technologist competencies. Unpublished Thesis, Alameh Tabatabaee Uinversity, Tehran, Iran.
Tavakoli, M. (1999). The situation of higher education in Iran, facts and challenges. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 18, 16-29.
Tennyson, R., D. (2001). Defining core competencies of an instructional technologist. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 355–361.
Tough, A., M. (1981). Learning without a teacher: A study of tasks and assistance during adult self-teaching projects: Ontario institute for studies in education.