Visiting digital fluency for pre-service teachers in Turkey
Main Article Content
Abstract
The technology advances rapidly; as a result, education and instruction are getting digitalized. So it could be estimated that; pre-service teachers who are future teachers, should have digital skills. This is the main point of this study which aims to visit pre-service teachers in Turkey from the perspective of digital fluency, give insights about digital fluency, scrutinize its difference from digital literacy and provide literature review on the previous studies about digital fluency. At first, the connection between digital fluency and the 21st century analyzed, then the differences between digital literacy and digital fluency are described. Worldwide and specifically Turkish literature review revealed that, certain studies foresaw the increasing importance of digital fluency based on development of digital devices, and Turkish literature was limited to some scale development and descriptive studies solely determining the digital literacy level of the participants. Thus, it could be stated that further and up-to-date studies are required, which would be conducted with pre-service teachers and current assessment instruments should be developed to determine digital fluency level, considering the rapid advances in technology.
Keywords: digital fluency, digital literacy, pre-service teachers.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Akkoyunlu, B., & Orhan, F. (2003). Bilgisayar ve ogretim teknolojileri egitimi (BOTE) bolumu ogrencilerinin bilgisayar kullanma oz yeterlik inancı ile demografik ozellikleri arasındaki iliski. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 86-93.
Akkoyunlu, B., Soylu, M. Y., & Çaglar, M. (2010). Universite ogrencileri için “Sayısal Yetkinlik Olçegi” gelistirme çalısması. Hacettepe University The Journal of Education, 39, 10-19.
Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, Y. (2010). Ogretmenlerin Sayısal Yetkinlikleri Uzerine Bir Çalısma. Turkish Librarianship, 24(4), 748-768.
Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping digital competence: towards a conceptual understanding. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Retrieved from: http://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/JRC67075_TN.pdf
Askar, P., & Umay, A. (2001). İlkogretim matematik ogretmenligi ogrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili oz-yeterlik algısı. Hacettepe University The Journal of Education, 21, 1-8.
Bartlett, J., & Miller, C. (2011). Truth, lies and the Internet: a report into young people's digital fluency.
Briggs, C. & K. Makice (Eds.) (2011). Digital Fluency: Building Success in the Digital Age. Sociolens. Retrieved from: http://www.socialens.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/01/ SociaLens_Digital_Fluency_Sample1.pdf
Bologa, R., Bologa, A. R., & Sabau, G. (2009). Success Factors for Higher Education ERPs. Computer Technology and Development.
Calvani, A., Cartelli, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2009). Models and instruments for assessing digital competence at school. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society-English Version, 4(3) , 183-193.
Cartelli, A., & Maillet, K. (2008). From Digital Literacy to Digital Competence: documents, analyses, suggestions, frameworks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Literacy Pursuing Digital Literacy in the 21st Century.
Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital Literacy: A New Terminology Framework and Its Application to the Design of Meaningful Technology-Based Learning Environments. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1): 93-106.
Educational Testing Service (2011). “Digital Fluency” and the new ETS iSkills Assessment. Retrieved from http://21k12blog.net/2011/10/25/digital-fluency-and-the-new-ets-iskills-assessment/
Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital Competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Sevilla: JRC IPTS.(DOI: 10.2791/82116).
Hsi, S., Pinkard, N., & K. Woolsey (2005), Creating Equity Spaces for Digitally Fluent Kids. Retrieved from http://exploratorium.edu/research/digitalkids/Digital_equity_paper.pdf
International Society for Technology in Education (2007). ISTE Student Standarts. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-s_PDF.pdf
Kıyıcı, M. (2008). Ogretmen Adaylarının Sayısal Okuryazarlık Duzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. (Unpublished PHD dissertation). Anadolu University/ Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Eskisehir.
Lanham, R. (1995), Digital literacy. Scientific American, 273(3), 160–161.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2005). Digital literacies: Policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Retrieved from http://www.oocities.org/c.lankshear/Oslo.pdf.
Martinovic, D., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Situating ICT in the teacher education program: Overcoming challenges, fulfilling expectations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 461-469.
Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355-367.
O'Keeffe, R. J. (2014). Baby boomers and digital literacy: Their access to, and uses of, digital devices and digital media. (Unpublished PHD dissertation). Pepperdine University, CA.
Olsson, L., & Edman-Stålbrant, E. (2008). Digital literacy as a challenge for Teacher Education Learning to Live in the Knowledge Society (pp. 11-18): Springer.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009). Is technology related to educational performance? Evidence from PISA. Retrieved from http://www.indire.it/db/docsrv/acqua/Is%20technology%20use%20related%20to%20Educational%20Performance.pdf
Papert, S., & M. Resnick (1995). “Technological Fluency and the Representation of Knowledge”. Proposal to the National Science Foundation. MIT Media Laboratory (1995).
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2011). Framework for 21st Century Learning . Washington,DC. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/1.__p21_framework_2-pager.pdf
Resnick, K. E., Alder, H., Hagan, J. P., Richardson, D. L., Croce, C. M., & Cohn, D. E. (2009). The detection of differentially expressed microRNAs from the serum of ovarian cancer patients using a novel real-time PCR platform.Gynecologic oncology, 112(1), 55-59.
Reinking, D., McKenna, M. C., Labbo, L. D., & Kieffer, R. D. (1998). Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world: Routledge.
Resnick, M. (2002). Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age. In G. Kirkman (Ed.), The global information technology report: Readiness for the networked word. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Savin-Baden, M. (2015). Rethinking Learning in an Age of Digital Fluency: Is Being Digitally Tethered a New Learning Nexus?. Routledge.
Sainz, M., Castano, C., & M. Artal (2008). Review of the concept “digital literacy” and its implications on the study of the gender digital divide. Retrieved from http://www.uoc.edu/in3/dt/eng/sainz_castano_artal.pdf
Tornero, J., M., P. (2004). Promoting Digital Literacy. Final Report EAC/76/03, Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/archive/elearning/doc/studies/dig_lit_en.pdf
UNESCO. (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001562/156207e.pdf
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2010). 21st century skills. Discussienota. Zoetermeer: The Netherlands: Kennisnet.