Perception of Profound Knowledge in SMEs in Slovakia
Main Article Content
Abstract
The system of profound knowledge is based on the principle that each organization is composed of a system of interrelated processes, and the people who make up the system’s components. The main objective of this paper is to introduce and clarify the known system of profound knowledge along with its four basic sections, and show, through the analysis of the business environment, that the implementation of this system in Slovak SMEs enables them to operate more effectively, as well as to achieve satisfaction of their employees and customers. Based on the analysis of using the system of profound knowledge in Slovak SMEs, the authors want to demonstrate to what extent it is possible to apply it in Slovak SMEs in order to maximize the benefits and minimize the potential risks of the system, and suggest several options of its implementation.
Keywords: Profound knowledge, risk management, psychology, process management, learning organization;
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Barták, J. 2008. Od znalostí k inovacím, Praha: Alfa Nakladatelství, s.r.o. pp. 190.
Bartosikova, R., Bilikova, J.,Taraba, P. 2014. Risk Management in the Business Sector in the Czech Republic. Vision 2020: Sustainable Growth, Economic Development, and Global Competitiveness, Vol 1-5, pp. 1643-1650.
Benčiková, D. 2013. Cultural intelligence – fiction or reality? In Management: Science and Education: Slovak scientific journal. Žilina: University of Žilina, Faculty of management science and informatics, Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 5-9.
Deming, W. E. 1992. Out of the Crisis, Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 507.
Dhanaraj, C., Parkhe, A. 2006. Orchestrating innovation networks. Acad. Manag. Rev. vol. 31, num. 3, pp. 659–669.
Goleman, D. 2000. Práce s emoční inteligencí. Praha : Columbus, pp. 366.
Hagger MS, Wood C, Stiff C, Chatzisarantis NL. 2010. Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 136, pp. 495–525.
Kaščáková A., Nedeľová G. 2010. Štatistické metódy pre spoločenské a humanitné vedy. Banská Bystrica : Univerzita Mateja Bela. pp. 31-32.
Palmberg, K. 2009, Exploring process management: are there any widespread models and definitions? In The TQM Journal, Number 2, pp. 203-215.
Pletzer, M. A. 2009. Emoční inteligence - Jak ji rozvíjet a využívat. Praha : Grada Publishing, pp. 176.
Ramakumar, A. and Cooper, B. 2004. Process standardization proves profitable, Quality, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 42‐5.
Senge, P. 2007. Pátá disciplína. Prvé vydanie. Praha: Management Press, pp. 439.
Simonovic, S. P. 2010. Systems Approach to Management of Disasters: Methods and Applications. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 348.
Vinczeová, M. 2008. Financing innovative SMEs with a focus on business angels. In: Perspective. Vedecký a kultúrny časopis, vol. XIII., number 14, pp. 181–186.
Wuellenweber, K., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T. and Koenig, W. 2008. The impact of process standardization on business process outsourcing success, Information Systems Frontiers, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 211‐24