On three dimensional perceptions in the visual age

Main Article Content

Melek Sahan

Abstract

Aim of the study is to examine the values of the three dimensional perception and collect information about that. Starting point is the observation of differences in two and three dimensional perception abilities of individuals having education in visual arts. It has been observed that some students, who have high level of competency in two dimensional perception, do not have the same competency in three dimensional perception. This is considered important since it creates two and three dimensional perceptions and differences of expression between them. We tried to emphasize the importance of the subject particularly in terms of visual arts education in the current visual age. The study is a document review. In this study we addressed the characteristics of the age we are living in, perception, visual perception, and two and three dimensional perception. We summarized the differences in visual perception and included three dimensional comprehension. By examining the related literature, we came to the conclusion that the two and three dimensional perception processes and their requirements are different. 

  Keywords: sculpture, three dimensional perceptions, visual perception, visual age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Berger J. (2010). Gorme Bicimleri, (Y.Salman, cev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.

Booth, D. (Ed.). (2003). Fighting poverty in Africa: Are PRSPs making a difference?. London: Overseas Development Institute.

Eristi, S., D., Uluuysal, B., & Dindar, M. (2013). Gorsel Algi Kuramlarina Dayali Etkilesimli Bir Ogretim Ortami Tasarımı ve Ortama Iliskin Ogrenci Gorusleri, Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 3(1), 47-66.

Erzen, J., N. (2011). Cogul Estetik. Istanbul: Metis Yayinlari.

Erzen, J., N. (2006). Cevre estetigi. ODTU Gelistirme Vakfı Yayincilik.

Findlay, J., M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active Vision: The psychology of looking and seeing.

Genc, A., & Sipahioglu, A. (1990). Gorsel Algilama- Sanatta Yaratici Surec. İzmir: Sergi Yayinlari.
Gombrich E.H. (2007). Sanatın Oykusu. (E. Erduran, O. Erduran, cev.). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.

Inceoglu, M. (2004). Tutum-Algi Iletisim. Ankara: Elips Kitap.

Kurt, M. (2002). Gorsel-Uzaysal Yeteneklerin Bilesenleri. Klinik Psikiyatri, 5, 120-125.

Leppert R., (2002). Sanatta Anlamin Goruntusu, ( I. Turkmen, cev.). Istanbul: Ayrinti Yayinlari.

Memis, A., & Harmankaya T. (2012). Ilkogretim Okulu Birinci Sinif Ogrencilerinin Gorsel Algi Duzeyleri, Turkiye Sosyal Arastirmalar Dergisi, 16(1), 27-46.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003). Goz ve Tin. (A. Soysal, cev.). Istanbul: Metis Yayinlari.

Orhon, N. (2011). Gorsel Kultur. Anadolu Universitesi Yayını no: 2403, Acıkogretim Fakultesi Yayın No: 1394, Editor Tevfik Fikret Ucar, Ekim 2011. Received from: http://ue.anadolu.edu.tr/eKitap/KUL202U.pdf

Ozcan, Z., Bayraktar, N., Goker, N., & Tekel, A. (2003). Kente Dair Analitik Bir Cozumleme: Sokaklar ‘İlk Yıl Sehir Planlama Atolyesi Deneyimi. Tasarım Egitiminde Gorsel Algı. Received from: www.Mmf.Gazi.Edu.Tr/Journal/2003_2/17-30.Pdf

Stoichita, I., V. (2006). Golgenin Kisa Tarihi. (B. Aydın, cev.). Ankara: Dost Kitabevi Yayinlari.
Yilmaz, M. (2006). Heykel Sanati. Ankara: Imge Kitabevi Yayinlari.