A better school organizational performance? Yes, but how?

Main Article Content

Raffaela Palma Claudia Russo Filomena Egizio

Abstract

This study ascertains, describes and examines the relationship between better school performance in a set of high secondary public schools in Campania (Italy) and significant variables of the school organization.

Within a systemic perspective, the study applies the analysis of principal components and the multiple regression model to first identify an objective output variable, i.e. Rate of Invalsi tests with higher marks than national average, which might measure a better school performance and then select the more significant variables which bear upon it. The findings show that these variables, when synergically working, will make the system itself function more effectively. This is, in our case, the interrelated action of stakeholders and facilities of the school system, that influences the variability of the output variable to the extent of 70%.

Knowledge and careful consideration of these factors can help increase a school's effectiveness, which allows the students to achieve better results confirmed, certified we would say, by their Invalsi tests, only if such factors are successfully managed. It is, however, necessary to more deeply study and evaluate these results to find out how and to what extent stakeholders' motivation comes into play.

 

Keywords: performance; public schools; resources; system 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

References
Bertalanffy, L., (1968).General system theory : Foundations, Development, Applications, NY.
Brewer, Gene A., (2010), Public service motivation and performance. In Walker R.M.,Boyne,G. Brewer, G. A., Public management and performance. Cambridge University Press, pp. 152-177
Dubnick, M. (2005).Accountability and the promise of performance : In Search of the Mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review 28(3) , pp 376-417.
Final Report of Invalsi 2011-12 http://www.invalsi.it/snv2012/documenti/Rapporti/Rapporto_rilevazione_apprendimenti_2012.pdf
Gupta, B.B. ,Agrawal, P.K. , Joshi, R.C., Misra, M., (2011).Estimating Strength of a DDoS Attack Using Multiple Regression Analysis. Springer, 33:280-289.
Hair, J. F., Rolph E.Anderson, Tatham, R. L., Black W. C., (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis ,(4th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Horn, J.L.,( 1965).A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , Psychometrika, 30:179–185.
Jensen G. E. (1954).The school as a social system.Educational Research Bulletin. Taylor & Francis ,33( 2), pp. 38-46
Jolliffe, I.T.( 2002). Principal Component Analysis.Second Edition, Springer,
Kaiser, H. F., (1960),The application of electronic computers to factor analysis, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20:141-151.
Kim,S. (2005). Individual-Level Factors and Organizational Performance in Government Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, . 15( 2),pp245–261,
T. Parsons, The Social System, New York, Free Press,( 1951), p. 107
Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert G. and Halligan J. Performance management in the public sector (2015), Routledge
Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327