A comparison the factors affected on academic satisfaction of students between traditional learning and distance learning models
Main Article Content
Abstract
The traditional on-campus classroom environments and distance learning have been the issue of debate and research in recent years. This research has also focused on these models. The main purpose of this research was to determine the factors affecting academic satisfaction and also the differences in academic satisfaction between distance learning and traditional learning students in tourism management education at SDU. To reach of the present research, first the literature was consulted to provide a conceptual model. Appropriate to the research model, 5-point Likert type survey has been prepared. Through conducting a face-to-face interview with 110 students of traditional learning program and an online (via internet) interview with 82 students of distance learning program were collected in the academic year of 2014-2015. The data obtained from the students was analysed via the SPSS. For the pre-test, reliability and validity analysis was done. And independent samples t-test was also used to determine whether differences in academic satisfaction of two groups. At second stage, structural and convergent validity of the data have revealed with the factor analysis. Then, correlation analysis and regression analysis were used. As a result, the findings demonstrated that the significant relationship between independent variables and academic satisfaction and all hypotheses have been supported.
Keywords: academic satisfaction, traditional learning, distance learning.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Uluslararası Turizm ve Otelcilik Sempozyumu-UTOS’11, 29 Eylül-01 Ekim 2011, Beyşehir, Konya.
Demir, Ş.Ş., & Demir, M. (2014). Öğrencilerin okul seçiminde kurumsal internet sitelerinin rolü: Turizmde Yükseköğrenim düzeylerine göre bir karşılaştırma. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 7(4), 529-549.
Douglas, J., Douglas, A., & Barnes, B. (2006). Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university. Quality assurance in education, 14(3), 251-267.
Greenfield, T., & Ribbins, P. (Eds.). (2005). Greenfield on educational administration: Towards a humane craft. New York: Routledge.
Lunenburg, F., & Ornstein, A. (2011). Educational administration: Concepts and practices. Belmont: Cengage Learning.
Özdamar, K. (1999). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
Sekaran, U. (2000). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Smith, P. L., & Dillon, C. L. (1999). Lead article: Comparing distance learning and classroom learning: Conceptual considerations. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 6-23.
Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2004). SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.