The politics of greening practice in contemporary rural China: a case study of Yang Village

Main Article Content

Songnan Fan Yao Sha

Abstract

This article takes Yang Village as a case to analysis what the specific implementation of the Three-North Shelterbelt Project is like. This village leader Laoyang gets afforestation projects through chasing project and mobilizes all the villagers by the method of economic benefits. While these afforestation projects promoted Yang Village economic income, it also ruins its local traditional pattern of production and living such as raising sheep. The study found the following conclusions: 1)Economy supremacy ideology plays a dual role. Not only does this strategy redirect the publics’ attention from environmental protection on to economic development, it also mobilizes the public’s will power to participate in such afforestation project. 2) Traditional rural culture and local production practice plays a subtle role in the designing and implementation process of environmental policies, projects and regulations.

 

Keywords: environment, afforestation, The Three-North Shelterbelt Project, chase project, rural society, economy supremacy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

2004. Introduction of the World's Largest Afforestation Project: Three North Shelter Forest System Project. Information Tribune, 06, 4-5.

2005a.The State Forestry Administration: China Invests Nearly 3.5 Billion Yuan on Three North Shelterbelt Project. Retrieved April 22, 2015 from:
http://www.chinanews.com/news/2005/2005-04-22/26/566041.shtml

2005b.Three North Shelter Forest Project Brings in Heilongjiang Province Comprehensive Benefit of 30 Billion Yuan. Retrieved January 18, 2015 from:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2005-01/18/content_2475226.htm

2005c. How Much Interest Drive Behind the Afforestation Actually in Vain. Nanfang Weekend, July 22.

2008. Ningxia: More than 6.6MillionYuanNational Investment for Protection Forest Construction, Retrieved December 10, 2015 from:
http://www.nx.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2008-12/10/content_15138237.htm

2013. The Three North Shelterbelt Construction Background. August 23, 2015 from:
http://www.jl.xinhuanet.com/haofei/haofei/2013-08/23/c_117069194.htm

Bauer, K. (2005). Development and the enclosure movement in pastoral Tibet since the 1980s. Nomadic Peoples, 9(1), 53–83.

Cao, S., Li Chen, & Xinxiao Yu. (2009a). Impact of China's Grain for Green Project on the landscape of vulnerable arid and semi-arid agricultural regions: a case study in northern Shaanxi Province. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 536–43.

Cao, S., C. Xu, L. Chen, & X. Wang. 2009b. Attitudes of farmers in China's northern Shaanxi province towards the land-use changes required under the Grain for Green Project, and its implications for the project's success. Land Use Policy, 26, 1182–94.

Harvey, D. (1998). What’s green and makes the environment go round. The Cultures of Globalization, 327-55.

Hui, L.Y. (2009). Speech of Vice Premier Liangyu Hui on the Summary Commendation Conference for 30 Years in Three North Shelter Forest System. February 18, 2015 from:
http://sbj.forestry.gov.cn/portal/sbj/s/2665/content-466392.htm

Hui, L.Y. 2012. State Council Holds Three North Shelterbelt Working Meeting in our Province, President LiangyuHui Attends and Makes Important Speech, August 28, 2015 from:
http://news.sina.com.cn/o/2012-08-28/090725052329.shtml

Hsiao-tung. (2007). From the Soil: the Foundations of Chinese Society. Shanghai people's publishing house, 25-35.

Kuehn, R.R. (2000). A taxonomy of environmental justice. Environmental Law Reporter, 30, 10688.

Li, C.J. (2013). The "Three Norths" Afforestation. Liaoning Daily, September 27.

Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: a review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change: a report to the Sustainable Development Research Network. Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey.

Yeh, E. T. (2013). The politics of conservation in contemporary rural China, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(6), 1165-1188.