Project evaluation for work-based education management in Chonburi Province

The objective of this research is to evaluate the project education management by area in Chonburi province. The special purpose is to evaluate the database of project information. The result found that the overall level is “fair” but project PR is the “lowest” average. Strengths of the project 1. The project is a priority in line with government policy, and in accordance with the requirements of the professional staff with expertise in specific fields. 2. The project is to be strengthened. The executives in the province to make a significant contribution. It also received support from many sectors. Both public and private sector.3. The project is unique of Chonburi.4. The project is well equipped in terms of personnel and agencies to cooperate.5. A program with a budget for the operation. The weakness of the project is stakeholder lack of understanding on the project entirely. The lack of awareness in action or sometimes in operation, it did not meet the objectives of the project.


Introduction
From a database of Chonburi (committee formed to study the province's base of Chonburi, 2015) found that graduates of junior high school students to study vocational less (16.90%) as an indicator that there is a shortage of graduates.education to enter the labor market of the industrial sector.Workers who want to graduate than undergraduate.Project Management for Employed spatial Chonburi.The cooperation of all sectors that are relevant to education reform in the area of Chonburi include public, private sector, civil society, local Department.Industry and tourism and agencies associated The Governor of Chonburi Province.Leadership to drive education reform in the province.And targeted education to those who have graduated junior high school education, vocational more.To produce a skilled labor force to enter the tourism industry and to enter the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) in 2015, aimed at development issues." Educational Management for Province Area Employment ".

Objective
To evaluate the project education management by area in Chonburi province, the special purposes are; 1) to evaluate the database of project information.
2) to assess the cooperation of a network of strategic partners.
3) to evaluate the course of Work-Based Education Management.4) to assess the system for supervision, monitoring and evaluation.5) to evaluate the operation project(PR).

Methodology
The target groups of the scheme covers teachers, parents and students in schools under the offense of 521 schools (23 pilot schools), Evaluation Framework using the integrated Model-based evaluation process and purpose of the project is Information System Cooperation partners of the plan.Program Management Education for Employment System supervision, monitoring and evaluation.And public relations program According to the assessment of six dimensions (Pongthep, 2011) include the assessment of indicators to measure and analysis data sources.And evaluation criteria Conducted between November 2015 and March 2016.

Tools quality.
In this evaluation of the project, the questionnaire was used to examine the quality of the instruments.

1.
To verify the accuracy.The content validity was used by three experts, consisting of the deputy administrators of the Office of Primary Education Area 1, Zone 2, Zone 3, Chonburi.Check index of Item Objective Congruence: IOC = 0.67 -1.00 2. Reliability.The revised questionnaire was used as a guideline by the experts.Reliability using the consistency formula with in Cronbach's alpha coefficient.α = .83-.92

Statistics in Data Analysis
In this research, the research team used the following data to analyze the data.

An analysis
Part 1. Evaluation by the working group or staffs.

The results of the evaluation of the educational program for the project work / Evaluation of the curriculum for early childhood education and job placement.
All results are evaluated in good level, when compared between the arguments.Item with average score lower than other explanations include the use of the curriculum.The purpose of the development Background and importance of development activities.Learners measure and evaluate learning and the standard of learning and indicators.The evaluation of the curriculum on job placement in elementary school by all items and overall are appropriate at a high level.When considering the individual score, it was found that the average score has the lowest suitability for measuring and evaluating learning.The evaluation of the curriculum of secondary education for job creation in general.The suitability is at a high level.And when considering the item, it was found.Low level of appropriateness.There are 2 items to measure and evaluate learning.Learning Standards and Indicators Other issues are good level.
The evaluation of the vocational education curriculum for vocational education was found to be overall.The results of the assessment.Considering each item, it was found that the lowest scores were 4 items: development activity Learning Media Measurement and Evaluation of Learning Standards and Indicators The appropriateness of the educational management program for job placement classified by level of education was found.Overall, the results of the assessment of the suitability of the curriculum were very high.When considering the curriculum, it was found that all courses the results of this study are as follows.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the educational program for employment based on the opinions of the board.People involved with the project Classified by site and by category.The overall effect was very high.When considering each aspect, it was found that the aspects with low evaluation result were at the level of 2 aspects: And the public relations project.

The results of the evaluation of provincial educational reform projects are based on teachers' opinions. Parents and students in pilot schools. And the outside pilot study school.
According to the opinions of teachers, staff, parents and students in the schools toward the educational reform project using the province as the base of Chonburi province.And the overall.The level of satisfaction was at the high level.The mean was 3.48, standard deviation .81 and the agreement was at a high level of 5 aspects.The mean was 3.95, S.D. = 0.62, followed by the performance of sector 2/2058 (mean= 3.86, S.D.= 0.76).

The dimension one: Implementation of the database information.
1. Education, including those related to information.It also does not use the information, do not understand the needs of the project.
2. Press the information is thorough, not a variety of channels.Content and knowledge of the information is not clear.
3. There is little information a complete lack of information on the needs of the profession, Chonburi.
4. Vocational already contains data.The basic data used in the community.

Recommendations relating to the preparation of the database.
1. Should the implementation of the database information be proactive?.
2. There should be cooperation.The school will encourage students to choose a career that is demanding the establishment and comply with the demand for labour in the future.

The dimension two: Implementation of the project plan.
1. Policy into practice, the lack of clarity.In the introduction to the education policy to practice.And the work of the Working Group on the lack of a coordinated system.
2. The level of participation notes that only teachers who are involved and sometimes unclear.The lack of awareness 3. Network participants also less.And the lack of establishment which contribute significantly to employment.And government organizations 4. The lack of clarity and detail of the project.You have to make.Indeed, in practice, some of the pilot schools.
5. Should the budget for education in the activities of some activities?126 2. The need for centralized, proactive public relations.

Feedback PR
1.There should be promoted proactively thoroughly.Every parent, school teacher, the students community.
2. The system should be coordinated with the work of the project.To better understand the work of the task to publicly acknowledge and common progress in the project.

The Strengths of the project
1.The project is a priority in line with government policy, and in accordance with the requirements of the professional staff with expertise in specific fields.
2.The project is to be strengthened.The executives in the province to make a significant contribution.It also received support from many sectors.Both public and private sector.
3. The project is unique of Chonburi province.4. The project is well equipped in terms of personnel and agencies to cooperate.5.A program with a budget for the operation.

The weakness of the Project
1. Stakeholders lack of understanding on the project entirely.The lack of awareness in action or sometimes in operation, it did not meet the objectives of the project.
2. The publicity did not thoroughly study the cause and who is involved is not informed of the news and information that must be applied to the project.
3. The lack of coordination on the part of the board and committee assignments.Including coordination so that partners are participating establishments.
4. There is no guide in the implementation of the project.The course manual Measurement Evaluation Guide.The lack of specialists in creating curriculum.
5. In the experiments, the participants of the pilot period are too short.It also failed to assess the achievement of learners including those databases are still not ready.
6. Bringing the project into practice by the lack of understanding.As a result, perceived as a burden.
7. There is no budget for education in the implementation of the project.

Acknowledgements
The acknowledgements of this research paper is faculty of education Burupha University and office of Chonburi province Thailand.
Correlation between variables by Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient (r).

Table 1 .
Mean and standard deviation of Strategic Plan Assessment The problem and the need of the people Based on utility and feasibility reviews, accuracy Suitable by item.

Table 2 .
Mean and standard deviation of strategic and the provincial educational reform guidelines based on utility and feasibility reviews, accuracy Suitable by item.

Table 3 .
Mean and standard deviation of effectiveness for Supervision, monitoring and evaluation per item.

Table 5 .
Mean and standard deviation of effectiveness in Educational Administration for Employment Per dimension of evaluation and overall project.
Part 2. Evaluation by people involved with the project and stakeholders: Teachers, Parents and students.

Table 6 .
Mean and standard deviation of Quality in Educational Administration for Employment By quality of project process.

Table 7 .
Mean and standard deviation of quality in Educational Administration for Employment By people involved with the project and stakeholders for project product.

Table 8 .
Mean and standard deviation of quality in Educational Administration for Employmen By people involved with the project and stakeholders per project dimension and overall.