Comparing NLP and Communicative Approach: A Study on Spoken Performance in ELT

Main Article Content

H. Sezgi Sarac
Ozdag Daglioglu Yazici

Abstract

 

Applications based on Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) in English language teaching (ELT) provide various means to make learning more effective and involving. Nevertheless, research on NLP is often based upon descriptive rather than empirical research. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the efficiency of NLP applications in ELT via comparing it with Communicative Approach (CA) to language teaching. In this study, a group of 4th grade students (N=20) was observed in a classroom in which CA techniques were applied. The students’ frequency of participation was recorded during two lessons. In another two classes with the same group of students, the learners’ frequency of participation was evaluated in a classroom setting where NLP techniques were applied. The results indicate that NLP-related applications are as efficient as CA applications in achieving high level of learner participation and oral production.

 

Keywords: Neurolinguistic programming; language teaching; young learners

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sarac, H. S., & Daglioglu Yazici, O. (2018). Comparing NLP and Communicative Approach: A Study on Spoken Performance in ELT. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(2), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v8i2.573
Section
Articles

References

Gall, J. P., Gall, M. D. & Borg, W. R. (2005). Applying Educational Research: A Practical Guide. Boston: Pearson.
Hardingham, A. (1998). Psychology for Trainers. Wiltshire: The Cromwell Press.
Harris, T. (2002). NLP: If it works use it … or is the censorship around? www.hltmag.co.uk/sep02/martsep023.rtf
Hismanoglu, M. (2006). Curent perspectives on pronunciation learning and teaching. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. Vol. 2(1), 101-110.
Khanzode, K. (2009). What Neuro Linguistic Programming has to Offer Your Students. British University in Dubai UAE. Vol. XVI. No 2.
Love, M. H. (2001). Neuro linguistic programming: A basis for language learning. The Journal of the Imagination in Language Learning and Teaching. Vol. VI, 100-109.
Millrood, R. (2004). The Role of NLP in Teachers’ Classroom Discourse. ELT Journal. Volume 58/1 January. Oxford University Press.
Revell, J. & Norman, S. (1997). In Your Hands. NLP in ELT. London: Saffire Press.
Revell, J and Nor man, S. (1999). Handing Over. London Saffire Press.
Seliger, H. W. & Shohamy, E. (1995). Second Language Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Tosey, P. & Mathison, J. (2003). Neuro-linguistic programming: It’s potential for learning and teaching in formal education. The European Conference on Educational Research, University of Hamburg, 17-20 September.
Winch, S. 2005. From Frustration to Satisfaction: Using NLP to Improve Self-Expression. QUT International College / TESOL Unit, School of Cultural and Language Studies, Queensland University of Technology. 18th Annual EA Education Conference, Surry Hills NSW.