Estimation of Vocational Training School (IEK) students’ contentment in relation to quality of their studies

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Apr 6, 2017
DOI https://doi.org/10.18844/gjhss.v2i6.1424

Main Article Content

Sofia D Anastasiadou
University of Western Macedonia, Florina, 53100, Greece
Xristina G. Fotiadoub Lazaros Anastasiadisc

Abstract

The current paper tries to capture the notion of service quality in post-secondary educational institutions. Determining students’ needs, expectations, satisfaction, contentment, and loyalty provides great service to the post-secondary educational institutions, while it puts forward the option to distinguish the strengths and weaknesses of these institutions and determine the areas that ought to be improved. Students’ contentment and satisfaction goes beyond teachers’ evaluation, which is a short sighted perspective, and includes wider concepts of students’ learning experience. In this context, knowing the degree of satisfaction is not enough. What is somewhat significant is to figure out the factors contributing to this satisfaction (BC College & Institute Student Outcomes, 2003). The current survey tries at revealing the causes leading to IEK students’ satisfaction or obstructing it. The study was carried out at IEK of West Macedonia, Greece and the research instrument used was SEVQUAL scale. It brings to light service quality dimensions using SEVQUAL scale in the framework of tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy. Furthermore, Correspondence Factorial Analysis was used for data analysis. Results relating to students’ contentment and quality of studies were not encouraging. Finally, problems affecting the quality of studies came forward. The identification of these obstacles will be the basis for seeking for solution in the framework of continuous improvement in post-secondary education.

 

Keywords: expectations; satisfaction; contentment; loyalty provides

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol 2 No 6 (2016): Selected Papers of 4th World Conference on Psychology and Sociology (PSYSOC 2015)
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

Bigné, E., Moliner, M.A., & Sánchez, J. (2003). Perceveid quality and satisfaction in multiservice organizations : the case of Spanish public services. Journal of Services Marketing, 17(4), 420-42.
Bushra, S.P. Singh. (2016). Using HiEduQual to assess student satisfaction in selected higher educational institutions in North India. International Research in Education, 4(1), 67-85.
Crosby, P.B.. (1979). Quality if free: The art of making quality certain New York: McGraw-Hill.
Deming, W.E (1986). Out of crisis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Đonlagić, S., & Fazlić, S. (2015). Quality assessment in higher education using the SERVQUAL model. Management, 20(1), 39-57.
Elmore, R. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement. Washington, DC: Retrieved from http://www.shankerinstitute.org/resource/bridging-gap-between-standards-and-achievement.
Feigenbaum, (1986). Total quality control, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ham, L., & Hayduk, S. (2003). Gaining competitive advantage in higher education: Analysing the gap between expectations and perceptions of service quality. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 16 (3), 223-242.
Hishamuddin Fitri Abu Hasan, Azleen Ilias, Rahida Abd Rahman & Mohd Zulkeflee Abd Razak (2008). Service Quality and Student Satisfaction: A Case Study at Private Higher Education Institutions. International Business Research, 1(3), 163-175.
Karapistolis, D. (2000). Software method of data analysis MAD. Ed. Athanasios Altintzis, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Karapistolis, D. (2015). Multivariate statistical analysis, Ed. Athanasios Altintzis. Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ksnaka, M. G. (2014). Assessing service quality in higher education using the SERVICE Tool. Proceeding of the 2014 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Bali, Indonesia, January, 7-9. 2014.
Leninkumar V. (2014). Impact of perceived service quality on students’ satisfaction. European Journal of Business and Management. 6(39), 42-49.
Papadimitriou, I. (2007). Data analysis. Athens: Ed. Tipothito..
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry L. (2002). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Retailing, 64(1), 12-37.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 43(3), 41-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251430.
Sahney, S., Banwet, D. K., & Karunes, S. (2005). A SERVQUAL and QFD approach to total quality education: A student perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(2), 143-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/174104004515043.
Vaz, A. & Mansori, S. (2013). Malasysian private education quality: Application of SERVQUAL model. International Educational Studies. 6(4), 164-170.