Identification and study of research groups in Learning, Teaching and Education Leadership

Article Sidebar

PDF Agreement Form Identification and study of research groups in Learning, Teaching and Education Leadership
Published Nov 17, 2016
DOI https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v8i4.930

Main Article Content

Julia Haba
University of Valencia, English and German Department, 46010 Valencia, Spain
Clara Haba
Polytechnic University of Valencia, E.T.S. Industrial Engineers, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Julia Osca-Lluch
Institute of Innovation and Knowledge Management (CSIC-UPV), 46022 Valencia, Spain

Abstract

The bibliometrical indicators, based on the statistical analysis of quantitative data from scientific literature, are currently an essential tool to the study researchers’ activity. In these lasts years, the use of bibliometrical indicators as a complement to other scientific indicators to analyse the research situation of a country, its evolution in time and its position in the international context has been extended.  The objective of this study is to analyse the scientific productivity in Learning, Teaching and Education Leadership throughout the communications presented in all of the World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Education Leadership (WCLTA) included in the database Web of Science (WoS). The process includes three basic phases: recovery, download and normalization of the bibliographical data to study, construction of a file with the authors’ productivity and groups delimitation by means of co-authorship frequencies. The last phase of this process consists in the characterization of the process through bibliometrical indicators: size of the group, production, productivity, collaboration rates and thematic specialization. 1,115 works that have been signed by a total of 2,619 authors compose the sample. The data indicates that the proportionate average of signatures by authors per work is of a 2.35%. A 27% of the works have been signed by a single author while a 73% have been done by 2 or more authors. The co-authorship works ranges from 404 works with two authors per work up to a work signed by 16 authors. Out of all the works analysed only 17.13% (191) have been cited, and 82.87% (924) have never been cited. Nevertheless, no significantly differences have been observed in the number of works signed or signing institutions and the number of cites received by the works. While analysing the authors’ geographical provenance, it is observed that the greater number of contributions come from Turkey, Iran, Malaysia, Romania, Spain Italy and the Czech Republic.

 

Key words: Research Groups, Web of Science, Productivity, Learning, Teaching and Education Leadership 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol 8 No 4 (2016): October
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).

References

Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Price, D.J. de S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149: 520-515.
Newman, MEJ. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101 (Suppl 1): 5200-5205.
Etzowitz, H. (1992). Individual investigators and their research groups. Minerva, 30 (1), 28-50. Doi: 10.1007/BF01096395
López Piñero, JM (1972). El análisis estadístico y sociométrico de la literatura científica.
Osca-Lluch, J. (2010). Aplicación del análisis de redes al estudio de la investigación española de historia de la ciencia. Revista Redes, 19, 6., diciembre
Osca-Lluch, J. (2012). Productividad y colaboración científica desde una perspectiva de género en la Revista Española de Drogodependencias. Revista Española de Drogodependencias, 37, 1: 9-21.
Osca-Lluch, J., Haba, J., Fonseca, S., Civera, C. and Tortosa, F. (2013). Tesis doctorales españolas sobre análisis bibliométrico en psicología. Aula Abierta, 41, 2: 99-110.
Rey-Rocha, J., Martin-Sempere, MJ. and Sebastian, J. (2008). Estructura y dinámica de los grupos de investigación. Arbor, 184, 723. doi:10.3989/arbor.2008.i732.219